The Government Created Healthcare Monopoly
Public Choice | Behavioral Economics
The government’s regulation of the medical industry has been a topic of much debate and controversy in recent years. On the one hand, regulations are necessary to ensure that healthcare providers are held to a high standard of care and that patients are protected from harm. On the other hand, these regulations can often have unintended consequences that make it more difficult for patients to access the care they need.
Monopoly
One of the most significant impacts of government regulation on the medical industry has been the creation of a few large corporations that dominate the healthcare market. These corporations have been able to use their size and market power to drive out competition, resulting in a lack of options for patients seeking medical care. This lack of competition has allowed these corporations to charge exorbitant prices for medical services, leading to a healthcare system that is often criticized for being inaccessible to many individuals due to its high cost.
Degrees Required in the Medical Field
There are also too many requirements to work in the healthcare field. Endless years of studying reduces the amount of students that go to school to be a nurse or doctor. This decreases the supply of healthcare workers. Thus increasing the price of healthcare.
Reducing the governmental requirements for participating in the healthcare field would not only decrease the price of healthcare but also increase employment opportunities. With less stringent requirements, more individuals would be able to enter the healthcare field, increasing the supply of healthcare workers and potentially driving down the cost of medical care. Additionally, relaxing regulations in medicine could allow for greater innovation and flexibility in the industry, ultimately benefiting patients and providers alike.
This kind of deregulation would need to be taken with extreme caution. Reducing regulation to enter the medical field would also reduce the quality of healthcare providers. They wouldn’t have as much education nor experience. In turn this could end up hurting the patients more than helping them. Although we do know that reducing regulations for entrance would reduce healthcare costs, a major problem in the United States.
Telemedicine Regulation
In addition to the high cost of medical care, government regulations have also limited the ability of healthcare providers to innovate and adapt to changing patient needs. For example, regulations on the use of telemedicine have made it more difficult for patients in remote or underserved areas to access medical care. Similarly, regulations on the use of medical devices can limit the ability of providers to use new technologies that may be more effective or less invasive than traditional approaches.
Despite these challenges, there are also many examples of innovative healthcare providers who are working within the current regulatory framework to provide high-quality care to patients. For example, some providers are using telemedicine to reach patients in remote or underserved areas, while others are developing new technologies to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of medical treatments.
Conclusion
Overall, the regulation of the medical industry is a complex issue with no easy solutions. While government regulations are necessary to ensure patient safety and to hold healthcare providers accountable, they can also have unintended consequences that make it more difficult for patients to access the care they need. As policymakers continue to debate the future of healthcare regulation, it will be important to strike a balance between these competing priorities and to create a system that is accessible, affordable, and responsive to patient needs.